![]() 03/05/2017 at 12:59 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
Someone on the FP was complaining that the biased media has become so shameful that they actually have the gall to endorse politicians, so I decided to see how long the Times has been endorsing candidates. Turns out that their first endorsement was for Lincoln.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/opinion/timeline/lincoln-1860.pdf
“Mr J.W. Gerard, who talks in italics and deals largely in very poor jokes”
“Mr. O’Conor becomes facetious—very much as a retained and well-bred hyena might be.”
![]() 03/05/2017 at 13:03 |
|
“Waxes strong on statistics and small quotations”...I’m adding that to my username. That’s awesome.
![]() 03/05/2017 at 13:04 |
|
I know, right? This thing is a treasure trove of burns.
![]() 03/05/2017 at 13:08 |
|
People on the FP need to google the Fourth Estate.
This is why education is so important.
![]() 03/05/2017 at 13:11 |
|
I was going to reply to them and explain how bad newspapers were through history but I’m just not in the mood to get in to it on a lazy Sunday. At the very least they should rewatch His Girl Friday/The Front Page.
![]() 03/05/2017 at 13:12 |
|
Everyone should rewatch His Girl Friday.
![]() 03/05/2017 at 14:02 |
|
During Madison-Jefferson, papers would common accuse opposing candidates of anything from adultery to atheism.
![]() 03/05/2017 at 23:08 |
|
I think today, either of those would be considered an endorsement rather than an indictment by large portions of the electorate. :/
![]() 03/05/2017 at 23:16 |
|
Saved the whole article to give to my dad. He’ll love this.
“Things will go on very much as they have hitherto.” Oh boy.
![]() 03/06/2017 at 00:39 |
|
Well an atheist president wouldn’t abide rumors of his staff supporting holy wars at least (not that they wouldn’t start a more pragmatic one) and our last adulterous president worked out alright.
Vote Immoral Bastard 2020!